After piecing together the post on Universal Search, I decided to take my own advice to see how others had illustrated the SEO/SEM process. It's harder than you think to illustrate a 3-dimensional, really 4-dimensional, process for those who are not at least somewhat familiar with how the dynamic mechanisms of the Web works. I hope these guys don't mind a little link love.
Here is the one that caught my eye first.
The illustration is from RedalKemi.com
That's really not a bad. You can take a look at it if you like. I'm just studying how the process is illustrated.
The diagram clearly illustrates the benchmarks. (Benchmarks is a project management term for issues that must be resolved before continuing with the project.) Time is implied from top to bottom.
There are a few unclear elements. CORE is a neologism from the marketing department. The initials LB and AS stand for Link Building and Automated Submissions, respectively. The website explains the terms and process in some depth, although for clarity the image could be made into a link map. There could be some confusion over whether AS stood for AdSense or Automated Submissions, for example.
This illustration is from the Center for Citizen Media blog.
Obviously, not everyone approves of SEO. I'm not sure which step the author disagrees with most: overaggressive marketers gaming the system or Google closing the loopholes and dinging the sites that break Google's rules.
It can be argued successfully (I can show a couple of examples offhand.) that marketers are creating better content and more timely content. The support for Google comes down almost to prejudice and politics. Will consumers revolt because content is more relevant (more informative and timely)? Is any of this destroying the Web? If you think of the Web as a young mind, then Google's Relevancy efforts are the way a child matures by learning and testing rules.
The philosophical and political arguments can go on and on.
As a marketing tool, this illustration from the Before Your Interview blog is great. Although it appears to be 2-dimensional, it's really linear; more correctly, circular.
It's intuitive and easy, and allows the presenter to discuss many issues in the process. It's attractive. The bright colored arrows catch the eye. The use of whitespace is good.
Despite the large numbered steps, it's a little unclear where to start. And where to finish. In a way, it deceives the intuition a little. There is less of an attempt to illustrate the details of the process than to allow the presenter and client to discuss the steps.
This illustration is from the Quality Nonsense blog.
Great stuff, huh?
Check out the blog, too. This is not True Confessions - more like a Letterman monologue.
You can quickly see the purpose of this illustration from PRomoting Webs site.
The colors are vibrant. The terms used are familiar. But for my purposes -to illustrate the SEO/SEM process, it's only marginally useful.
This could be an introduction of a Powerpoint presentation. Topics are essentially listed in a creative presentation of an outline.
There's no meaningful timeline. 'Strategy' is a slide title; not a step.
This illustration from Bristol Bath Exeter Plymouth Online web E-marketing gets into more depth. But it's so unclear about the presentation an arrow is required to indicate the flow of time.
That's too plain to really catch the eye. In fact, it's a little hard to follow for the uninitiated. There's no question the presenter means business though.
Now, this is a marketing plan! - from ProBlogger right here in Australia.
That's not an illustration. It's an ambitious plan that states goals. It doesn't say much about how those goals will be achieved. Nor does it illustrate recursive steps. This guy wants it all, and NOW!
Combined with a couple of the other illustrations, it could be very effective. To accomplish those goals though, this guy needs to assemble a team. Wonder if he needs an SEO Consultant?
In the light of the introduction of Universal Search, and presuming the quality of illustration will improve, - none of these illustrations is very impressive. In different circumstances -different clients, where the illustration appears, and style of presentation or presenter, all of them could be effective to explain the process.
This illustration from Inventa Technologies is a little too complicated.
'Development' is really a title. My first thought was to animate it like a roulette wheel. Those small arrows in the center are unnecessary. Some of them are even off-center, too. It's a good list of the initial steps for SEM. It's businesslike (which means the colors could be brighter), but where is the starting point?
The arrows between items seem to indicate each item is a benchmark. They're not. Keyword Selection doesn't have to be done before Site Architecture is done. The list is organized more for the developer than SEO.
I can't escape the feeling this illustration needs animation, and maybe some mouseover effects.
I'm going to finish this little exercise with an illustration I like from the Huntas search engine.
Vibrant earth colors dynamically arranged with energetic lettering, the illustration demands attention.
Overlaying circles suggests topics affects others; and a sequence. To emphasize the sequence, small arrows link around the circles. Although details are missing, the sequencing is accurate. You do have to Optimize a web site before you Submit web pages, for example.
It's a distinctive design, yet businesslike. A student of design will tell you those are Southwestern colors, which have become acceptable throughout the world for business. So the designer kept within the expectations of their audience.
The 2-dimensional design illustrates time effectively. The illustration is intuitively clear and could stand on its own. It requires no presenter or additional text to get its point across.
I hope you've enjoyed my review of some of the design efforts to illustrate the SEO/SEM process. Let me know what you think.
PS If representatives of any of the authors or sites wants their illustration removed, feel free to contact me. I'll remove it instantly along with my comments.
SEO/SEM in Australia is a special issue for so many reasons. Join me was we explore. It will be a fascinating and informative journey.
Sphere: Related Content
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Hi Nice Blog .It is not enough just to have a lot of backlinks, it is the Quality of backlinks along with the Quantity that help you rank better in Search Engines used with seo company india
Great tips included in this post and very informative. Thank you for sharing these simple SEO tricks for promoting site, Please update more informative entries.
Sydney Search engine optimization
Post a Comment